Current:Home > ScamsHong Kong court upholds rulings backing subsidized housing benefits for same-sex couples -RiseUp Capital Academy
Hong Kong court upholds rulings backing subsidized housing benefits for same-sex couples
View
Date:2025-04-27 15:04:13
HONG KONG (AP) — A Hong Kong court on Tuesday upheld two earlier rulings that supported the granting of subsidized housing benefits to same-sex couples, in another victory for the city’s LGBTQ+ community.
The decision rejected appeals by the Housing Authority of the earlier rulings, which said some of its policies violated the constitutional right to equality.
One of the policies denies same-sex couples married overseas eligibility to apply for public rental housing as an “ordinary family.” The other excludes same-sex married partners of owners of subsidized apartments from being defined as “family members” and “spouses,” blocking them from receiving joint occupancy and ownership rights that heterosexual couples enjoy.
Judges of the Court of Appeal said the differential treatment “is a more severe form of indirect discrimination than most cases because the criterion is one which same-sex couples can never meet.”
The ruling is expected to have a strong impact on the lives of same-sex couples.
Currently, Hong Kong only recognizes same-sex marriage for certain purposes such as taxation, civil service benefits and dependent visas. Many of the government concessions were won through legal challenges in recent years as the city has seen a growing social acceptance of same-sex marriage.
Last month, the city’s top court ruled in a landmark decision that the government should provide a framework for recognizing same-sex partnerships.
Henry Li, who was involved in one of the housing benefit cases, said in a Facebook post that he was thankful for the court decision and hoped the Housing Authority would not file another appeal.
The organization Hong Kong Marriage Equality said on Facebook that the ruling showed that public policies should protect everyone’s interests and shield them from discrimination based on their sexual orientation.
veryGood! (4761)
Related
- The FTC says 'gamified' online job scams by WhatsApp and text on the rise. What to know.
- Backstage at New York's Jingle Ball with Jimmy Fallon, 'Queer Eye' and Meghan Trainor
- Trump invites nearly all federal workers to quit now, get paid through September
- Finally, good retirement news! Southwest pilots' plan is a bright spot, experts say
- Appeals court scraps Nasdaq boardroom diversity rules in latest DEI setback
- Juan Soto to be introduced by Mets at Citi Field after striking record $765 million, 15
- B.A. Parker is learning the banjo
- Backstage at New York's Jingle Ball with Jimmy Fallon, 'Queer Eye' and Meghan Trainor
- Retirement planning: 3 crucial moves everyone should make before 2025
- Former Syrian official arrested in California who oversaw prison charged with torture
Ranking
- IRS recovers $4.7 billion in back taxes and braces for cuts with Trump and GOP in power
- Whoopi Goldberg is delightfully vile as Miss Hannigan in ‘Annie’ stage return
- At site of suspected mass killings, Syrians recall horrors, hope for answers
- See you latte: Starbucks plans to cut 30% of its menu
- Why Sean "Diddy" Combs Is Being Given a Laptop in Jail Amid Witness Intimidation Fears
- Average rate on 30
- Backstage at New York's Jingle Ball with Jimmy Fallon, 'Queer Eye' and Meghan Trainor
- Angelina Jolie nearly fainted making Maria Callas movie: 'My body wasn’t strong enough'
Recommendation
IRS recovers $4.7 billion in back taxes and braces for cuts with Trump and GOP in power
Questlove charts 50 years of SNL musical hits (and misses)
South Korean president's party divided over defiant martial law speech
'We're reborn!' Gazans express joy at returning home to north
Charges tied to China weigh on GM in Q4, but profit and revenue top expectations
New Mexico governor seeks funding to recycle fracking water, expand preschool, treat mental health
Former Syrian official arrested in California who oversaw prison charged with torture
Intellectuals vs. The Internet